38%
Pew says 38 percent of U.S. adults regularly got news on Facebook in its Sept. 25, 2025 social-media fact sheet.
Jump to any public page from mobile without losing the side-rail structure on desktop.
Media Ownership tracks concentrated distribution power, not just generic anti-corporate rhetoric. This page shows where people actually get news, then pairs that usage layer with ownership resources, antitrust enforcement, and platform-governance records.
These figures do not prove monopoly by themselves. They do show which platforms currently hold major news-distribution leverage and how creator news now sits inside those same systems.
Pew says 38 percent of U.S. adults regularly got news on Facebook in its Sept. 25, 2025 social-media fact sheet.
Pew says 35 percent of U.S. adults regularly got news on YouTube in its Sept. 25, 2025 social-media fact sheet.
Pew says 20 percent of U.S. adults regularly got news on Instagram in its Sept. 25, 2025 social-media fact sheet.
Pew says 20 percent of U.S. adults regularly got news on TikTok in its Sept. 25, 2025 social-media fact sheet.
Pew says 21 percent of U.S. adults regularly got news from news influencers on social media in its Nov. 4, 2025 fact sheet.
Among adults who get news from influencers, Pew says 52 percent think most of those influencers are independent and not connected to a news organization.
The older page used unsupported market-share language. The rebuilt version starts with observable distribution behavior and then follows the ownership, merger, and enforcement paperwork underneath.
This page is no longer pretending that one ownership percentage can explain the whole information environment. The stronger question is which companies control major distribution lanes, advertising rails, recommendation systems, and local station ownership records at the same time.
Platform power does not only look like a merger headline. It also shows up in the interfaces that determine what news appears, what looks native, what looks urgent, and which publishers have to route their work through someone else's feed or ad system.
Influencers and creators can feel like alternatives to concentrated media, but large shares of that distribution still depend on a few giant platforms, ranking systems, and monetization rules. Independence at the personality layer can still ride on concentrated pipes underneath.
The records work here is to separate usage, ownership, and enforcement. A platform can be heavily used without proving monopoly, and an antitrust case can exist without proving editorial intent. This page keeps those layers distinct.
Pew says Facebook and YouTube still outpace every other social platform as places where Americans regularly get news, at 38 percent and 35 percent respectively. That is not a market-share claim, but it is a strong signal about distribution leverage.
Pew says 21 percent of U.S. adults regularly get news from influencers, and 52 percent of those audiences think most of those influencers are independent from news organizations. Platform-native authority now competes directly with newsroom authority.
DOJ says its Antitrust Division jointly released the 2023 Merger Guidelines with the FTC, and its current home page still highlights the Google ad-tech monopolization case. The ownership and platform-power story is still active enforcement terrain, not just history.
Current platform-by-platform benchmarks for where U.S. adults regularly get news.
Current benchmarks for influencer news reach, perceived independence, and discovery patterns.
Broadcast ownership and media-policy materials, including ownership-report resources and related FCC actions.
Competition and consumer-protection case library, including merger review and anticompetitive conduct materials.
Current federal antitrust enforcement and guidance, including the 2023 Merger Guidelines and major platform cases.
Public-company filings for major media, advertising, and platform firms.
FTC framework for interface tactics that can steer attention, consent, and purchase behavior at scale.
Media Ownership now completes the trio with Mind Control and News Suppression. One investigation explains how attention is shaped, one checks where coverage appears, and this one follows the ownership, enforcement, and platform-governance layer underneath.
We do not publish exact ownership or concentration claims unless the ownership record, merger record, or enforcement filing is linked on the page.
High usage is not the same thing as monopoly. Audience reach metrics and competition claims stay clearly separated.
Bot-network, suppression, or dark-pattern claims need a visible method and cited evidence, not just intuition about the product experience.