NOAA opened the file as a fisheries review
NOAA's biological opinion and essential fish habitat response says the project would adversely affect essential fish habitat for Pacific Coast salmon and Pacific Coast groundfish. NOAA issued conservation recommendations in the same file.
The NOAA record puts shipping, wake, contaminant, and shoreline effects inside the federal review.
NOAA measured downstream wake effects
NOAA says that if the facility's ocean-going vessel traffic exceeds 171 round trips per year, the consultation's expected effects and incidental-take assumptions would also be exceeded.
The same opinion says wake stranding would likely occur across about 11 miles of known downstream stranding beaches below the facility.
NOAA used a 50-year operating life in parts of the review
NOAA says some contaminant and moorage-related effects would persist through the new useful life of the facility, about 50 years.
The NOAA review measures long-term operating effects in addition to construction effects.
The Corps lists tribes inside the comment and consultation process
The Army Corps EIS page says it is collecting comments from the public, tribes, agencies, and others through April 20, 2026.
The Corps tribal-relations page says Columbia permitting work includes consultation duties tied to cultural resources, fish and wildlife conservation, and treaty rights.
The consultation file ties fish habitat to treaty-resource review
NOAA's biological opinion covers habitat effects, vessel traffic, and downstream shoreline conditions. The Corps' process adds tribal consultation, cultural resources, and treaty rights to the same permit file.
Those federal documents place fisheries and tribal-resource review in the Port Westward docket before a final permit decision.
