Follow the money. Understand the consequences. Get the whole story.
11 stories matching "NEXT Renewable Fuels"
Clear filters
The Port Westward file already contains a formal conflict waiver, a major rent deferral, and a public dock bill the Port itself described as a significant unfunded liability.
Port commissioners, Port staff, state coordinators, and developer-side names keep appearing across leases, board minutes, and the permitting machinery.
NOAA's consultation record and the Army Corps tribal-relations process place Port Westward inside a Columbia River fisheries and tribal-resource file, not a stand-alone local land-use dispute.
Grail's EFSC exemption order to Haley Teach's Oct. 8, 2024 401 hearing deck to the Corps' current EIS docket, with each agency handling a different permit question on a different schedule.
The Regional Solutions packet, the Port's 2024 strategic business plan, and Port Resolution 2024-03 identify the Port, local taxing districts, and state development agencies as public-side beneficiaries if the project is built.
Seismic risk is already reshaping both the private plant design and the public dock's capital burden, which makes this more than a simple permit-box issue.
DEQ told commenters that trains and marine vessels are "secondary emissions not considered in this stationary source permitting action." The Army Corps Draft EIS later treated those movements as central project facts.
Local filings now point the Corps to Beaver Drainage Improvement Company comments, Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission materials, Draft EIS transport volumes, and questions about how the applicant's filings line up with the federal review.
DEQ's 401 certification places the proposed discharge path in waters connected to McLean Slough and the Clatskanie River. DEQ also lists existing dissolved oxygen, temperature, dioxin, total dissolved gas, PCB, and DDE impairments in the receiving-water system.
DEQ's Jan. 7, 2025 certification says the project would create 72.6 acres of new impervious surface. NOAA's biological opinion says 23 ESA-listed species or distinct population segments are likely to be adversely affected.
If you want to understand the Port Westward fight, start with the public record: wetland fill, fish habitat impacts, impaired receiving waters, and a permit history that has already forced the project back through review more than once.